This article was published in the Malay Mail Online
By Low Teck Kuan
Tony Tan Chee Chong,
ex-DAP man and former personal assistant to Teresa Kok has come out with guns
blazing claiming that Tony Pua, one of the staunchest critics of the 1MDB
scandals should not be so happy as to demand for accountability from 1MDB just
yet.
This is because
under his possession, he has documentary proof that behind Tony Pua’s backyard he has amassed RM 3
millions of savings stashed overseas under the name of his wife.
Tony Tan further
declared if Pua cannot declare his assets in a week, then he will publish
documentary proof of Tony Pua’s allegedly RM 3 million in savings overseas.
But in Tony Tan’s haste to discredit the DAP’s star man down, obviously
because Pua has been at the forefront of putting the Prime Minister and his
government in check, he has misunderstood the reasoning behind not just Pua,
but all other opposition members and NGOs demands in asking those who holds
executive positions to declare their assets publicly.
Why asset declaration is necessary
Those who hold
executive positions, whether they are elected into the law making body (State
Assembly or Parliament) or not must declare their assets publicly simply
because they are in a position where the responsibility of managing taxpayer’s monies are heavily entrusted
onto their hand.
They are in the
positions where they hold substantial powers to allocate the public’s resources, If abused, it will
result in taxpayers monies going missing for personal and illegal gains. The
MARA scandal, where properties in Australia were purchased by MARA (a
government linked company) at an inflated price just so that kickbacks can be
given back to MARA officials, is one fine example.
Now here begs the
question, does Tony Pua hold any executive positions? Or is he appointed into
any government linked companies backed with allocations from the federal
government? No.
Pua is simply an
elected Member of Parliament, who only receives a fixed monthly allowances paid
by the Parliament. Therefore, why does he who does not have any responsibility
of managing taxpayers monies need to declare his assets?
Tony Tan should not
confuse the responsibility to declare assets by the Prime Minister (who is the
head of the executives and a Finance Minister), with those who does not have
any responsibility in managing the country's resources. In his attacks against
an MP, he either could not tell these differences or has a sinister agenda in
trying to discredit Pua even when his credibility is in doubt.
Much like Lester
Melanyi, the bankrupt who could only shoot off his mouth without substantiating
his claims of tampered documents with evidences to the contrary, Tony Tan has a
credibility issues as well.
Back in February
2014, accompanied by Ramesh Rao (the same guy who backed Lester Melanyi), Tan
had previously lodged reports to the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission twice
accusing Teresa Kok of misappropriating party's funds. However, the MACC did
not find any misappropriation at all. He also filed a case against her in court
but lost.
If Tony Tan, perhaps
like Lester Melanyi who "acts out of his conscience”, has time to question Pua and
his innocent wife, he should instead direct his time and resources in seeking
answers from the Prime Minister on the many unanswered allegations against him.
For starters, he
should question on how and why 1MDB’s USD 700 million been deposited into Jho Low’s Singapore company Good Star
Ltd back in September 2009? Until this date, 1MDB and PM Najib have not
provided satisfactory answers to the public.
Gutter politics must be condemned
To also hear Tony
Tan, dragging the families of Pua who is not involved in politics at all is
disgusting to say the least. Its gutter politics, clearly out to demonise Pua
and to draw an illogical perception that he and his families had abused his
public office in enriching himself. Even when as a Member of Parliament, Pua
merely receives a fixed monthly allowances!
Malaysians, by and
large, are currently witnessing the dirtiest and most undignified political
plays. As seen by all, it is orchestrated by Ramesh Rao (who is a staunch
supporter of the Barisan Nasional government) and various unscrupulous parties
against the critics of the biggest financial scandal in history.
This must be
condemned. Not just because these constitute harassments against opposition
members who are doing their level best to keep the government in check, but on
grounds that Malaysians do not tolerate dirty politics and diversionary tactics
designed to divert the our attentions away from the real issue at hand. That
is, where has 1MDB’s unaccounted
and missing funds gone to?
As the buck stops
with the Prime Minister, Malaysians must therefore focus their attention solely
on 1MDB and seek accountability from the man whose office holds the greatest
responsibility of managing the country's vast but diminishing resources.
No comments:
Post a Comment